"The EPA’s Science Office Removed 'Science' From Its Mission Statement" (New Republic; 3/7/17)

TL;DR: Truth Is More Parodic than Parody: Scott Pruitt & Co. Are Taking the Word “Science” Out the Name of A Key EPA Office Charged With Protecting Water Quality

Environmentalists often argue for performance-based regulations, where air and water is required to meet a certain standard of quality, no matter how companies choose to meet that standard. Gehrke says removing “science” from OST’s missions and replacing it with “technologically achievable” means the EPA is moving toward more technology-based standards, where polluters just have to install certain types of technology.
Some worry these changes signal the EPA’s new direction—one that prioritizes business interests over public health and science—under new Administrator Scott Pruitt, who has close ties to fossil-fuel companies. Pruitt didn’t mention public health once in his first speech to agency employees, instead focusing on improving the EPA’s relationship with private interests. In a tweet after his speech, Pruitt said he was committed to working with several types of  “stakeholders” on environmental stewardship. He did not mention environmentalists as one of those stakeholders.